06-28-2022, 02:43 AM
(This post was last modified: 06-28-2022, 02:55 AM by WasabiDadSFO.)
Sorry for posting twice. 
Doing both of those steps did indeed eliminate the performance problem in the 310 with dual displays although it still imposes a significant hit on my CPU (5800x3d). In my experiments I start the 310 with the GNS530:
- CPU temp is in 60s and fps is 80+.
...After switching to dual NXi screens.
- CPU temp jumps to 80+ and fps is in the 50s.
So while these fixes did indeed improve the performance enough where it is usable, is it expected to add that sort of CPU load even with fixes applied?
In the Sting S4 with a single screen this is no issue at all.
If dual 750s are a known issue I wonder if it's worth suggesting to developers to make the 750/650 layout instead? (e.g. that is what is done in the Just Flight Arrow and although I don't have that I've see yt videos where no performance issue is seen).
Thank you very much.
Doing both of those steps did indeed eliminate the performance problem in the 310 with dual displays although it still imposes a significant hit on my CPU (5800x3d). In my experiments I start the 310 with the GNS530:
- CPU temp is in 60s and fps is 80+.
...After switching to dual NXi screens.
- CPU temp jumps to 80+ and fps is in the 50s.
So while these fixes did indeed improve the performance enough where it is usable, is it expected to add that sort of CPU load even with fixes applied?
In the Sting S4 with a single screen this is no issue at all.
If dual 750s are a known issue I wonder if it's worth suggesting to developers to make the 750/650 layout instead? (e.g. that is what is done in the Just Flight Arrow and although I don't have that I've see yt videos where no performance issue is seen).
Thank you very much.